MELAF GA LLC v. Tucker
| MELAF GA LLC |
| Tammy Tucker |
| 1:2019cv03939 |
| September 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Justin S Anand |
| Eleanor L Ross |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Certified copy of #5 Order mailed to Clerk of Court, Magistrate Court of Clayton County. (tcc) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Tammy Tucker re #6 Letter, #5 Order on Final Report and Recommendation. (tcc) |
Filing 5
ORDER - The Court ADOPTS the Final Report and Recommendation [Doc. #3 ] as the opinion of this Court. For the reasons stated in the R&R, the Court REMANDS this action to the Magistrate Court of Clayton County, Georgia. Signed by Judge Eleanor L. Ross on 9/30/2019. (tcc)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (tcc) |
| Submission of #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, to District Judge Eleanor L. Ross. (jpa) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Tammy Tucker re #4 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation, #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (jpa) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Service of #3 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 9/5/19. (jpa)
|
| Filing 3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 Notice of Removal. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be REMANDED to the Magistrate Court of Clayton County. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 9/5/19. (jpa) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Tammy Tucker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jpa) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
|
(Found in #3 R&R) ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 9/5/19. (jpa)
|
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (tcc) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tammy Tucker. (Attachments: #1 Petition For Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(tcc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MELAF GA LLC v. Tucker | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MELAF GA LLC | |
| Represented By: | Russell Isaac Phillips |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tammy Tucker | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
