Toby v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Mary Toby
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2019cv03962
Filed: September 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Justin S Anand
Referring Judge: Thomas W Thrash
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2019 Filing 6 Return of Service Executed by Mary Toby. Commissioner, Social Security Administration served on 9/12/2019, answer due 12/23/2019. (Osterhout, Karl)
September 23, 2019 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Mary Toby. (Osterhout, Karl)
September 23, 2019 CLERK'S Notification of Reassignment to US Magistrate Judge Pursuant to Standing Order 07-02 re: Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand for all further proceedings. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 1:19-cv-03962-JSA. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. (sap)
September 10, 2019 APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #2 APPLICATION for Admission of Karl E. Osterhout Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-8911946). Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse.. Attorney Karl E. Osterhout added appearing on behalf of Mary Toby (pmb)
September 6, 2019 Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as to the U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General, and the Office of the Regional Chief Counsel. (sap)
September 6, 2019 Filing 4 COMPLAINT filed by Mary Toby. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sap) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.
September 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 9/6/2019. (sap)
September 5, 2019 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Admission of Karl E. Osterhout Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-8911946). Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse.by Mary Toby. (Ginsberg, Jonathan)
September 5, 2019 Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (eop)
September 4, 2019 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Mary Toby. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summon(s) -3)(eop)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Toby v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Toby
Represented By: Jonathan Charles Ginsberg
Represented By: Karl E. Osterhout
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?