Martin-Michael Ventress v. Equifax, Inc.
| Martin-Michael Ventress |
| Equifax Inc |
| 1:2019cv03968 |
| September 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Thomas W Thrash |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING this case. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 9/5/2019. (sap)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (sap) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Martin-Michael Ventress re #10 Order. (sap) |
| Filing 9 Case transferred in from District of California Central; Case Number 8:19-cv-01466. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Filing 8 Conditional Transfer Order - 47 from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 2800, transferring case to USDC, Northern District of Georgia and assigned to Honorable Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom) [Transferred from California Central on 9/5/2019.] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Transfer to MDL filed by Defendant Equifax, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 10/25/2019 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Proposed Order) (Attorney Brian Priestley added to party Equifax, Inc.(pty:dft)) (Priestley, Brian) [Transferred from California Central on 9/5/2019.] |
| Filing 6 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg) [Transferred from California Central on 9/5/2019.] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) [Transferred from California Central on 9/5/2019.] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (car) [Transferred from California Central on 9/5/2019.] |
| Filing 3 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Equifax, Inc. (car) [Transferred from California Central on 9/5/2019.] |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Martin-Michael Ventress (car) [Transferred from California Central on 9/5/2019.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant Equifax, Inc. Case assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early.(Filing fee $ 400 FEE PAID) Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Martin-Michael Ventress. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car) [Transferred from California Central on 9/5/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martin-Michael Ventress v. Equifax, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Martin-Michael Ventress | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Equifax Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
