Ciboroski v. Sequim Asset Solutions, LLC et al
Cheri Ciboroski |
Sequim Asset Solutions, LLC, DOES 1-10, inclusive and Focus Receivables Management |
1:2019cv04022 |
September 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
J Clay Fuller |
William M Ray |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 STATUS REPORT by Cheri Ciboroski. (Lemberg, Sergei) |
Filing 5 ORDER directing that Plaintiff provide a status report to the Court within 14 days from the date of entry of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller on 10/17/19. (ddm) |
Filing 4 Return of Service Executed by Cheri Ciboroski. Sequim Asset Solutions, LLC served on 9/20/2019, answer due 10/11/2019. (Lemberg, Sergei) |
Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Cheri Ciboroski. (tcc) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Sequim Asset Solutions, LLC. (tcc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Cheri Ciboroski. (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-8916716) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tcc) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.