Saho v. Equifax, Inc
| Abraham Saho |
| Equifax, Inc |
| 1:2019cv04252 |
| September 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Russell G Vineyard |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint with Brief In Support by Abraham Saho. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Amended Complaint)(Gomez, Octavio) |
| Filing 7 OBJECTIONS to #4 Report and Recommendation filed by Abraham Saho. (Gomez, Octavio) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Octavio Gomez on behalf of Abraham Saho (Gomez, Octavio) |
Filing 5
ORDER for Service of #4 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on 10/31/2019. (tmf)
|
| Filing 4 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Notice of Removal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on 10/31/2019. (tmf) |
| FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION : It is RECOMMENDED that Equifax's motion to dismiss, [Doc. #2 ], be GRANTED and that Saho's complaint be DISMISSED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate this referral. Ruled on at #4 R&R by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on 10/31/2019. (tmf) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Abraham Saho re #4 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, #5 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (tmf) |
| Submission of the #2 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (aaq) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons by Equifax, Inc. (Emmanuel, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM with Brief In Support by Equifax, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Brief)(Emmanuel, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Equifax, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AGANDC- 8950318) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- State Court Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jed) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used- forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
| Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard added. (jed) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Saho v. Equifax, Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Equifax, Inc | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Emmanuel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Abraham Saho | |
| Represented By: | Octavio Gomez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
