Martin v. Brooks et al
| Carlos Martin |
| Samuel S. Olens and Nathan Brooks |
| 1:2019cv04525 |
| October 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Justin S Anand |
| J P Boulee |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE Of Filing by Nathan Brooks (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 a copy of the Court of Appeals opinion, affirming Petitioners convictions and sentences on October 11, 2013. Martin v. State, 324 Ga. App. 252, 749 S.E.2d 815 (2013)., #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 a copy of Petitioners Dodge County habeas corpus petition, filed on October 9, 2014., #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 a copy of Petitioners amendment to the habeas corpus petition., #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4 a copy of the Dodge County habeas corpus courts final order, denying relief on April 1, 2019., #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5 a copy of the appellants brief filed in direct appeal.)(Hill, Meghan) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Former Attorney General Olens As Improper Party Respondent by Nathan Brooks. (Attachments: #1 Brief IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL OLENS AS IMPROPER PARTY RESPONDENT)(Hill, Meghan) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Petition as Untimely by Nathan Brooks. (Attachments: #1 Brief IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION AS UNTIMELY)(Hill, Meghan) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER- RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Samuel S. Olens.(Hill, Meghan) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Paula K. Smith on behalf of Nathan Brooks (Smith, Paula) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Meghan Hobbs Hill on behalf of Nathan Brooks (Hill, Meghan) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis #3 . The Clerk transmit a copy of the petition and this Order by certified mail to Respondent and the Attorney General for the State of Georgia. Respondent shall show cause within thirty (30) days of the receipt of this Order why the writ should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 10/31/19. (ddm)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Carlos Martin re #4 Order and to Nathan Brooks (via certified mail receipt # 91 7199 9991 7032 5717 8064), State AG Carr (via certified mail receipt # 91 7199 9991 7032 5717 8071) re #1 Petition, #4 Order. (ddm) |
| Submission of #3 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account, to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (ddm) |
| Filing 3 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Carlos Martin. (ddm) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER directing that Petitioner must, within 30 days of the date of this Order, either submit the full initial filing fee of $5.00, or execute and return a financial affidavit seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 10/15/19. (ddm)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Carlos Martin re #2 Order, IFP form. (ddm) |
| Submission of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for IFP and Frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (eop) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Carlos Martin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
