Bailey v. Hays State Prison
| Jason Quinard Bailey |
| Hays State Prison and Warden Kevin Sprayberry |
| 1:2019cv04544 |
| October 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Walter E Johnson |
| Eleanor L Ross |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Brief in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jason Quinard Bailey. (ddm) |
| Filing 10 Certified Mail Returned Receipt as Attorney General of State of Georgia re #5 Order. (dob) |
| Filing 9 Certified Mail Returned Receipt as to Warden, Hays State Prison re #5 Order. (dob) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Paula K. Smith on behalf of Kevin Sprayberry (Smith, Paula) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Meghan Hobbs Hill on behalf of Kevin Sprayberry (Hill, Meghan) |
| Filing 6 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERRORFINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jason Quinard Bailey. The undersigned RECOMMENDS that the Complaint #1 be DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1). The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the referral to the undersigned. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 10/16/19. (klb) Modified on 10/16/2019 (klb). Modified on 10/18/2019 (anc). |
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING In Forma Pauperis. ORDER directing Clerk to perfect service of petition and order on respondent by certified mail, with copy to State Attorney General. Respondent is directed to show cause within 60 days of receipt of order why writ should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 10/16/19. (klb)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Warden Hays State Prison re #5 Order and #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (klb) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing s to US Attorney General re #5 Order and #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (klb) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Jason Quinard Bailey re #5 Order. (klb) |
|
ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 10/16/19. (klb)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Jason Quinard Bailey re #4 Order. (jpa) |
| Submission of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, #3 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account, to Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. (jpa) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING this action to the Atlanta Division for further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 10/9/19. (jpa)
|
| Case transferred in from Rome Division Division. Case Number 4:19-cv-232. (jpa) |
| Submission of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, #3 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account, to Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. (bjh) |
| Filing 3 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Jason Quinard Bailey; signed by an Authorized Officer. (bjh) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Jason Quinard Bailey. (bjh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jason Quinard Bailey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Letter)(bjh) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
