Davis v. Ethica Healthcare
| Whitley Davis |
| Ethica Healthcare and Ethica Healthcare doing business as Traditions Health & Rehabilitation Center, LLC |
| 1:2019cv04587 |
| October 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Amy Totenberg |
| Linda T Walker |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons by Whitley Davis. (Blackburn, Calvin) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ethica Healthcare identifying Other Affiliate HEALTH SCHOLARSHIPS INC for Ethica Healthcare. (Martin, William) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT by Ethica Healthcare. Discovery ends on 4/17/2020.(Martin, William) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Ethica Healthcare. (rjs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-9001991) filed by Whitley Davis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rjs) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
