Davis v. Professional Bureau of Collection
| Johnnie Davis |
| Professional Bureau of Collection and U.S. Department of Education |
| 1:2019cv04590 |
| October 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Charles A Pannell |
| Contract: Other |
| 28:1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Submission of #3 Complaint for frivolity determination, to District Judge Charles A. Pannell Jr.. (tcc) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Johnnie Davis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tcc) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Johnnie Davis re #2 Order ruling on IFP. (tcc) |
Filing 2
ORDER GRANTING In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to submit this matter to the District Judge for a frivolity determination under 1915(e)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 10/17/2019. (tcc)
|
| Submission of the #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly. (aaq) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Johnnie Davis. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(aaq) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
