Schram v. Ideal Image of Georgia (JV2), LLC
Cinthia D. Schram |
Ideal Image of Georgia (JV2), LLC and Ideal Image of Georgia (JV2), LLC doing business as Ideal Image Buckhead |
1:2019cv04651 |
October 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Eleanor L Ross |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Clerks Notation re #5 Certificate of Interested Persons/Corporate Disclosures by Cinthia D. Schram. Read and approved by District Judge Eleanor L. Ross. (mlb) |
Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons by Cinthia D. Schram. (Pankey, Larry) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Cinthia D. Schram. Ideal Image of Georgia (JV2), LLC waiver mailed on 10/21/2019, answer due 12/20/2019. (Pankey, Larry) |
Filing 3 NOTICE FROM THE COURT: INSTRUCTIONS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE ELEANOR L. ROSS. (mlb) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Ideal Image of Georgia (JV2), LLC. (jed) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Cinthia D. Schram. (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC- 9010431) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jed) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used- forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.