Mejia v. JS Elite Painting Pros, LLC et al
| Elmer Mejia |
| Jose Suyo and JS Elite Painting Pros, LLC |
| 1:2019cv04654 |
| October 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steven D Grimberg |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to JS Elite Painting Pros, LLC. (jed) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Elmer Mejia JS Elite Painting Pros, LLC c/o Jose A. Suyo Cardenas (registered agent) (Thomas, Brandon) |
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER regarding civil litigation. All counsel of record and pro se parties are required to sign and file, within 10 days after entry of this Order, a Certificate of Compliance in a format consistent with the Certificate of Compliance attached as Exhibit B. Signed by Judge Steven D. Grimberg on 10/2/19. (jpa)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-9010862) filed by Elmer Mejia. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Consent Form - Representative Plaintiff - Elmer Mejia, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(rjs) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
