East v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Alan East |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2019cv04739 |
| October 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Justin S Anand |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons - US Attorney, #2 summons - Attorney Genera)(bdb) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT Requesting Review Of An Administrative Decision Under The Social Security Act filed by Alan East. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bdb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Therefore, this action shall proceed as any other civil action, and Plaintiff shall be allowed to proceed without prepayment of a filing fee. Plaintiff is represented by counsel and has not requested that the Court order that service of the summons and complaint be made by the United States Marshal.Accordingly, counsel for Plaintiff is appointed to effect service of process upon Defendant pursuant to Rule 4(c) of the FRCVP. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c). Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 10/25/2019. (bdb)
|
| CLERK'S Notification of Reassignment to US Magistrate Judge Pursuant to Standing Order 07-02 re: Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand for all further proceedings. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 1:19-cv-04739-JSA. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. (bnp) |
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (bdb) |
| CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Alan East. (Martin, Charles) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Alan East. (Attachments: #1 Complaint Requesting Review Of An Administrative Decision, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Text of Proposed Order, #4 Summons - Attorney General, #5 Summons - OGC, #6 Summons - US Attorney)(bdb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: East v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alan East | |
| Represented By: | Charles Lee Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
