Bentley v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
| Cindi J. Bentley |
| Does 1-5 and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| 1:2019cv04845 |
| October 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Walter E Johnson |
| Thomas W Thrash |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to respond. It is ORDERED that, within TWENTY (20) DAYS of the date of this Order, plaintiff pro se must explain to the Court in writing why defendant's Motion should not be granted. While plaintiff pro se requests time to obtain counsel, the Court reminds her that she chose to proceed pro se and, as the plaintiff, is responsible for prosecuting her case. If plaintiff pro se obtains counsel, the Court will address any further requests for extension at that time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 12/9/19. (klb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/9/2019: #1 signed order) (klb).
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Cindi J. Bentley re #6 Order. (klb) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to #4 Order to Show Cause and to Obtain Legal Counsel by Cindi J. Bentley. (anc) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - it is ORDERED that, within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of the date of this Order, plaintiff pro se must explain to the Court in writing why that Motion should not be granted. The Court will recommend dismissal of this case for want of prosecution if plaintiff pro se does not comply with this Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); N.D. Ga. Civ. R. 41.3(A)(2), (The court may, with or without notice to the parties, dismiss a civil case for want of prosecution if... [a] plaintiff... shall, after notice,... fail or refuse to obey a lawful order of the court in the case....).The Clerk is DIRECTED to resubmit this matter to the undersigned after expiration of the above period. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 11/19/19. (klb)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Cindi J. Bentley re #4 Order to Show Cause. (klb) |
| Clerk's Notation re #3 Certificate of Interested Persons: OK, per TWT. (cmd) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. identifying Corporate Parent Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Ebbs, Arthur) |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for Insufficient Process and Insufficient Service of Process and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support with Brief In Support by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Deed under Power, #2 Exhibit Security Deed, #3 Exhibit Assignment, #4 Exhibit Loan Modification Agreement, #5 Exhibit Notice)(Ebbs, Arthur) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number AGANDC-9038120) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -Security Deed, #2 Exhibit -Assignment, #3 Exhibit -Loan Modification, #4 Exhibit -Correspondence, #5 Exhibit -Superior Court Filings, #6 Notice of NOR, #7 NOR to Plaintiff, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
