Nadel v. United States of America
| Brett Nadel |
| United States of America |
| 1:2019cv04867 |
| October 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Timothy C Batten |
| Catherine M Salinas |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. (adg)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Brett Nadel re #5 Order on Final Report and Recommendation, #6 Clerk's Judgment. (adg) |
Filing 5
ORDER ADOPTING #3 Final Report and Recommendation. This action is dismissed without prejudice and the Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. on 12/4/2019. (adg)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (adg) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Service of #3 Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 11/12/19. (rsh)
|
| Filing 3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Brett Nadel be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction. Because Petitioner is in federal custody, he does not require a certificate of appealability to appeal from the denial of his 2241 petition. Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the referral to the undersigned. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 11/12/19. (rsh) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Brett Nadel re #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, #4 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (rsh) |
|
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Hearing (contained within R&R #3 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 11/12/19. (rsh)
|
| Submission of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for IFP and Frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (eop) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for an Immediate Hearing by Brett Nadel. (eop) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Brett Nadel. ( Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number GAN100116814.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nadel v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Brett Nadel | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
