Diaz v. The Kroger Co.
| Maria Santacruz Diaz |
| The Kroger Co. |
| 1:2019cv04915 |
| October 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE discovery to plaintiff by The Kroger Co..(Lisle, Sarah Raquel) |
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: re: #7 Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan Upon review of the information contained in the Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan form completed and filed by the parties, the Court orders that the time limits for adding parties, amended the pleadings, filing motions, completing discovery, and discussing settlement are as set out in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this Court. Discovery begins on November 30, 2019 and ends on May 30, 2020. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 11/25/2019. (tmf)
|
| Filing 8 First Initial Disclosures by The Kroger Co..(Lisle, Sarah Raquel) |
| Filing 7 Joint JOINT PRELIMINARY REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN filed by The Kroger Co.. (Lisle, Sarah Raquel) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Kroger Co. by The Kroger Co..(Lisle, Sarah Raquel) |
| Clerks Notation re #6 Corporate Disclosure Statement, reviewed and approved by LMM. (rvb) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 11/7/2019. (jed)
|
| Filing 4 Notice for Leave of Absence for the following date(s): 01/03/20, 01/06/20, 01/08,2020 - 1/10/2020, 01/23/20, 01/24/20, 02/10/20, - 02/14/20, 03/04/20 -03/06/20, 03/26/20, 03/27/20, 03/30/20, 04/02/20, 04/03/20, by Matthew G. Moffett. (Moffett, Matthew) Modified on 11/8/2019 to consolidate dates (jed). |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by The Kroger Co. (sap) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by The Kroger Co. Discovery ends on 3/30/2020. (sap) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by The Kroger Co. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AGANDC-9046989) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (sap) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Diaz v. The Kroger Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Kroger Co. | |
| Represented By: | Sarah Raquel Lopes Lisle |
| Represented By: | Matthew G. Moffett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Maria Santacruz Diaz | |
| Represented By: | Robert Norman Levinson |
| Represented By: | Villard Bastien |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
