Cannalte et al v. HBC Services Inc. et al
Leslie Crow and Jami Cannalte |
HBC Services Inc. and Charles Henry |
1:2019cv04955 |
November 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
J P Boulee |
John K Larkins |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Clerks Entry of Default as to HBC Services Inc., Charles Henry. (ddm) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Clerks Entry of Default against Defendants by Jami Cannalte, Leslie Crow. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Proposed Order)(Hormozdi, Shireen) |
Filing 4 Return of Service Executed by Jami Cannalte, Leslie Crow. Charles Henry served on 11/8/2019, answer due 11/29/2019. (Hormozdi, Shireen) |
Filing 3 Return of Service Executed by Jami Cannalte, Leslie Crow. HBC Services Inc. served on 11/8/2019, answer due 11/29/2019. (Hormozdi, Shireen) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to HBC Services Inc. and Charles Henry. (Attachments: #1 Summons Charles Henry)(ah) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jami Cannalte and Leslie Crow (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-9050863). (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ah) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.