Smith v. LP Atlanta, LLC
Plaintiff: Keith Smith
Defendant: LP Atlanta, LLC
Case Number: 1:2019cv05044
Filed: November 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Steven D Grimberg
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2019 Civil Case Terminated. (jed)
December 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #3 Motion to Compel Alternative Dispute Resolution. The Clerk is DIRECTED to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case. The parties are ORDERED to file documents to dispose of the case within 7 days of any out-of-court resolution. Absent an extension of that deadline or further order of the Court, if no request to reopen the case is made within 90 days, the case will be considered DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE at that time. Signed by Judge Steven D. Grimberg on 12/16/2019. (jed)
December 3, 2019 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Compliance (Bingham, William)
December 2, 2019 Submission of the #3 MOTION to Compel Alternative Dispute Resolution and MOTION to Stay Proceedings to District Judge Steven D. Grimberg. (aaq)
November 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING ORDER All counsel of record and pro se parties are required to sign and file, within 10 days after entry of this Order, a Certificate of Compliance in a format consistent with the Certificate of Compliance attached as Exhibit B. Signed by Judge Steven D. Grimberg on 10/2/19. (jpa)
November 14, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE Of Filing Exhibit 1 to Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Compel Alternative Dispute Resolution and Stay Proceedings by LP Atlanta, LLC re #3 MOTION to Compel Alternative Dispute Resolution and MOTION Stay Proceedings (Bingham, William) Modified on 11/15/2019 (adg).
November 14, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION to Compel Alternative Dispute Resolution and MOTION to Stay Proceedings with Brief In Support by LP Atlanta, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Brief Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Compel Alternative Dispute Resolution and Stay Proceedings, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Bingham, William) . Added MOTION to Stay on 11/15/2019 (adg).
November 13, 2019 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons by LP Atlanta, LLC. (Bingham, William)
November 7, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AGANDC-9063695) filed by LP Atlanta, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Ex. A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Ex. B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(rjs) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. LP Atlanta, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Smith
Represented By: Hillman James Toombs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LP Atlanta, LLC
Represented By: William Shawn Bingham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?