Taylor v. Georgia Institute of Technology
Cheryl Anita Taylor |
Georgia Institute of Technology |
1:2019cv05092 |
November 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Alan J Baverman |
Orinda D Evans |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Submission of #3 Order, #4 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and #5 Amended Complaint, to Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman. (bdb) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT (CLAIM/RESPONSE) against Georgia Institute of Technology with Jury Demand filed by Cheryl Anita Taylor.(bdb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Filing 4 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cheryl Anita Taylor. (bdb) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Cheryl Anita Taylor re #3 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (bdb) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. However, in order for the undersigned to conduct a full frivolity review so that Plaintiff's case may proceed, she is ORDERED to file an amended complaint in accordance with the above-mentioned instructions within THIRTY (30) DAYS from entry of this order. Plaintiff is CAUTIONED that failure to fully and timely comply with this Order may result in a recommendation to the District Judge that she dismiss the case as frivolous and as a sanction for failure to follow a lawful Order of the Court. The Clerk of the Court is hereby DIRECTED to re-submit the action to the undersigned within thirty-five (35) days from entry of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 11/22/2019. (bdb) Modified on 11/25/2019 (bdb). (bdb). |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Cheryl Anita Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bdb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman. (adg) |
Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to District Judge Orinda D. Evans for review. (adg) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cheryl Anita Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(adg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Taylor v. Georgia Institute of Technology | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Georgia Institute of Technology | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cheryl Anita Taylor | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.