Hormozdi Law Firm, LLC v. Advantage Investigative Services, LLC
Hormozdi Law Firm, LLC |
Advantage Investigative Services, LLC |
1:2019cv05173 |
November 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Michael L Brown |
Other Statutory Actions |
47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Advantage Investigative Services, LLC. (Pate, William) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Advantage Investigative Services, LLC by Advantage Investigative Services, LLC.(Pate, William) |
Filing 7 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Advantage Investigative Services, LLC. (Pate, William) |
Filing 6 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT by Advantage Investigative Services, LLC. Discovery ends on 5/29/2020.(Pate, William) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
Filing 5 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer by Advantage Investigative Services, LLC. (Pate, William) |
ORDER (by docket entry only). The parties filed a document entitled "Stipulation Extending Time to Answer" in which the parties purport to extend Defendant's time, up to and including 12/31/2019, to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. (Dkt. #5 .) The parties cannot stipulate to extend an answer deadline in federal court. A party must move the Court to extend a deadline, showing good cause, and the Court must grant the extension. Nevertheless, the Court will grant the parties' request, up to and including 12/31/2019, for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. All future requests for extensions of deadlines must be made by motion. Ordered by Judge Michael L. Brown on 12/17/2019. (bgt) |
Filing 4 Return of Service Executed by Hormozdi Law Firm, LLC. Advantage Investigative Services, LLC served on 11/27/2019, answer due 12/18/2019. (Clapp, Charles) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER regarding civil litigation. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 11/8/2019. (bgt) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Advantage Investigative Services, LLC. (jap) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Hormozdi Law Firm, LLC (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-9092909). (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jap) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hormozdi Law Firm, LLC v. Advantage Investigative Services, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Hormozdi Law Firm, LLC | |
Represented By: | Charles Moses Clapp |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Advantage Investigative Services, LLC | |
Represented By: | William B. Pate |
Represented By: | John D. Dixon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.