Robinson v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. et al
Maeve Sumner Robinson |
Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. and Transworld Systems, Inc. |
1:2019cv05179 |
November 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
J Clay Fuller |
Charles A Pannell |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Transworld Systems, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Aston Acquisition Corp. for Transworld Systems, Inc.. (Smith, Kirsten) |
Filing 3 Transworld Systems Inc.'s ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Transworld Systems, Inc.. Discovery ends on 5/11/2020.(Smith, Kirsten) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. and Transworld Systems, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons Transworld Systems, Inc.)(ah) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Maeve Sumner Robinson (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-9095343). (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ah) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.