Brown v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
| Timmy Brown |
| Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
| 1:2019cv05489 |
| December 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Mark H Cohen |
| Linda T Walker |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Electronic Summons Issued as to US Attorney. (dob) |
| Filing 6 Electronic Summons Issued as to Regional Counsel. (dob) |
| Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as to Attorney General. (dob) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT filed by Timmy Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(dob) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 1/8/2020. (dob)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER GRANTING #2 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Kenneth R. Hiller by CRD at the direction of the Court. Approved by Judge Mark H. Cohen on January 8, 2020. If the applicant does not have CM/ECF access in the Northern District of Georgia already, they must request access at http://pacer.gov. If they have electronically filed in this district in a previous case, please omit this step.(lwb)
|
| APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #2 APPLICATION for Admission of Kenneth R. Hiller Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-9219652). Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse.. Attorney Kenneth R Hiller added appearing on behalf of Timmy Brown (pmb) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Admission of Kenneth R. Hiller Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-9219652). Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse.by Timmy Brown. (Flynn, Kathleen) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Timmy Brown. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Summons Proposed, #6 Summons Proposed, #7 Summons Proposed, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(ah) |
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. (ah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Timmy Brown | |
| Represented By: | Kathleen Marie Flynn |
| Represented By: | Kenneth R Hiller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
