Baum v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Elizabeth Baum |
Equifax Information Services, LLC, Transunion, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
1:2019cv05655 |
December 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Timothy C Batten |
J Clay Fuller |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
RETURN of #3 APPLICATION for Admission of Jacob W. Hippensteel Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-9290450). to attorney for correction re: courts. (pmb) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION for Admission of Jacob W. Hippensteel Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-9290450).by Elizabeth Baum. (Oise, Esther) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse. |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Equifax Information Services, LLC, and Transunion, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., #2 Summons Trans Union, LLC) (jap) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Elizabeth Baum (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-9182423). (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jap) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.