Monroy v. Michaels Stores, Inc.
| Yvette Monroy |
| Michaels Stores, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv05710 |
| December 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Charles A Pannell |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER - Upon review of the information contained in the Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan, the court orders that the time limits for adding parties, amending pleadings, filing motions, completing discovery, and discussing settlement are as stated in the completed form [Doc. No. #6 ] except as herein modified: Daubert motions with regard to expert testimony shall be filed no later than 30 days after the close of discovery. This case shall proceed on an 8-month discovery track. Signed by Judge Charles A. Pannell, Jr. on 1/21/2020. (tcc)
|
| Filing 7 First Initial Disclosures by Yvette Monroy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Witness List, #2 Exhibit Expert Witness List, #3 Exhibit Document List, #4 Exhibit Computation of Damages, #5 Exhibit Insurance Agreements)(Crawford, David) |
| Filing 6 JOINT PRELIMINARY REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN filed by Michaels Stores, Inc.. (Bryant, Candice) |
| Filing 5 Initial Disclosures by Michaels Stores, Inc..(Bryant, Candice) |
| Filing 4 Joint Certificate of Interested Persons by Yvette Monroy. (Crawford, David) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint within #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by Michaels Stores, Inc. (jap) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint within #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by Michaels Stores, Inc. Discovery ends on 5/18/2020. (Originally filed in State Court on 12/19/2019) (jap) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Michaels Stores, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AGANDC-9193767). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Superior Court Docs, #2 Exhibit B - Letter and Notice, #3 Exhibit C - Affidavit of Candice R. Bryant, #4 Exhibit Answer, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (jap) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Monroy v. Michaels Stores, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Yvette Monroy | |
| Represented By: | David Scott Crawford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Michaels Stores, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Robb Cruser |
| Represented By: | Candice Renee Bryant |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
