Sewell v. Daniel
Plaintiff: William Sewell
Defendant: William Daniel
Case Number: 1:2019cv05790
Filed: December 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Timothy C Batten
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER denying #4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. on 2/11/2020. (dmb)
February 7, 2020 Filing 14 RESPONSE in Support re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Request for Immediate Order Response to Defendant's Supplemental Brief filed by William Sewell. (Greene, Reginald)
February 7, 2020 Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by William Sewell. (Attachments: #1 Statement of Material Facts Response)(Greene, Reginald)
February 6, 2020 Filing 12 RESPONSE to Plaintiff's Supplemental Brief re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Request for Immediate Order filed by William Daniel. (Martinez, William) Modified on 2/7/2020 to correct docket text (dmb).
February 5, 2020 Filing 11 Supplemental Brief in Opposition re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Request for Immediate Order filed by William Daniel. (Martinez, William) Modified on 2/7/2020 to correct docket text (dmb).
February 5, 2020 Filing 10 Supplemental Brief re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Request for Immediate Order filed by William Sewell. (Greene, Reginald) Modified on 2/7/2020 to correct docket text(dmb).
February 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to file by Wednesday, February 5 at 4:00 p.m., a supplemental brief explaining why he does not have an adequate remedy at law by filing a notice of lis pendens in Fulton County Superior Court. Before the same deadline, Defendant shall file a supplemental brief explaining why he should not be equitably estopped from asserting the defense that the manner in which Sewell purported to exercise the option was insufficient. See, e.g., Mesa Air Group, Inc. v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 573 F.3d 1124 (11th Cir. 2009) (applying New York law). Each side will have until Friday, February 7, at 4:00 p.m. to respond to the other sides supplemental brief. Signed by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. on 2/3/20. (rsh)
January 24, 2020 Filing 8 REPLY BRIEF re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Request for Immediate Order filed by William Sewell. (Greene, Reginald)
January 21, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION for Summary Judgment with Brief In Support by William Daniel. (Attachments: #1 Brief Brief in Support (MSJ Motion), #2 Statement of Material Facts Statement of Material Facts)(Martinez, William) --Please refer to http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain the Notice to Respond to Summary Judgment Motion form contained on the Court's website.--
January 17, 2020 Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Request for Immediate Order filed by William Daniel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A (Affidavit of Defendant Daniel), #2 Exhibit Exhibit B (Lease-Purchase Agreement))(Martinez, William)
January 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Request for Immediate Order filed by William Sewell. Defendant is ordered to file its response brief by Friday, January 17. Plaintiff will then have seven days to file any reply brief it deems necessary. Signed by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. on 1/9/2020. (dmb)
January 6, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Request for Immediate Order with Brief In Support by William Sewell. (Greene, Reginald)
December 30, 2019 Filing 3 Instructions to Parties and Counsel Signed by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. on 12/30/2019. (dmb)
December 26, 2019 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint within the #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by William Daniel. Discovery ends on 5/26/2020. (ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/09/19.)(aaq) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions.
December 26, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT AND REQUEST FOR TRO AND/OR INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTION filed by William Daniel. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AGANDC-9209093) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(aaq) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.
December 26, 2019 Submission of #1 Notice of Removal with COMPLAINT AND REQUEST FOR TRO AND/OR INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTION to District Judge Timothy C. Batten Sr. (aaq)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sewell v. Daniel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Sewell
Represented By: Reginald A. Greene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Daniel
Represented By: William Dwayne Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?