Patterson v. Aldridge Pite Haan LLP et al
Jarrieth Patterson |
DOES 1-10, inclusive and Aldridge Pite Haan LLP |
1:2020cv00003 |
January 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Justin S Anand |
Mark H Cohen |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Submission of #2 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (dob) |
Filing 4 REPLY BRIEF re #2 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Aldridge Pite Haan LLP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Leet, Nicole) |
Filing 3 RESPONSE re #2 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM PLAINTIFF'S MOTION LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS filed by Jarrieth Patterson. (Prado, David) |
Filing 2 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM with Brief In Support by Aldridge Pite Haan LLP. (Attachments: #1 Brief Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Leet, Nicole) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Aldridge Pite Haan LLP. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AGANDC-9226884). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ah) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.