State of Georgia v. Hill
| State of Georgia |
| Dantriel Hill |
| 1:2020cv00209 |
| January 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Amy Totenberg |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Correspondence to Cobb County State Court Clerk re #5 Remand Order. (bnp) |
Filing 5
ORDER: Petitioner's removal of the prosecution from the State Court of Cobb County was improper and this Court lacks jurisdiction over this case. It is therefore ORDERED this action be REMANDED to the State Court of Cobb County. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 1/22/2020. (bnp)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Dantriel Hill re #5 Order. (bnp) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (bnp) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing to Cobb County State Court Clerk re #5 Remand Order and #6 Correspondence. (bnp) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER: GUIDELINES TO PARTIES AND COUNSEL PROCEEDING BEFORE THE HONORABLE AMY TOTENBERG. You are required to sign and file a Certificate of Compliance in a format consistent with the Certificate of Compliance attached hereto. To request to file material under seal, the Parties should follow the mechanism described in Section II(J) of Appendix H to the Court's Local Civil Rules. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 1/21/2020. (bnp)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Dantriel Hill re #4 Standing Order. (bnp) |
| Submission of #2 Order to District Judge Amy Totenberg for frivolity determination. (bnp) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Dantriel Hill re #2 Order. (bnp) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Dantriel Hill. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bnp) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. It is further ORDERED that service of process shall not issue at the present time, and the Clerk shall submit this file to the assigned District Judge for a frivolity determination under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2), as well as to address whether the Court has jurisdiction over this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on 1/16/2020. (bnp)
|
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (ah) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dantriel Hill. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: State of Georgia v. Hill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: State of Georgia | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dantriel Hill | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
