Lin v. Barr et al
| Quanren Lin |
| Denise Frazier, Ken Cuccinelli, Chad Wolf and William Barr |
| 1:2020cv00434 |
| January 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Naturalization Application |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to William Barr. (Attachments: #1 U.S. Attorney B.J. Pak)(tcc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/31/2020: #2 Summons William Barr) (tcc). |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Quanren Lin (Attachments: #1 Summons Summons to BJ Pak, #2 Summons Summons to Chad Wolf, #3 Summons Summons to Denise Frazier, #4 Summons Summons to Ken Cuccinelli, #5 Summons Summons to William Barr)(Kuck, Phillip) |
| Filing 6 Electronic Summons Issued as to Denise Frazier. (tcc) |
| Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as to Ken Cuccinelli. (tcc) |
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Chad Wolf. (tcc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Quanren Lin. (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-9316308) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(tcc) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
