Arch Specialty Insurance Company
Arch Specialty Insurance Company |
Estevan Mancilla Leyva and IA Daron Village, LLC |
1:2020cv00481 |
January 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
J P Boulee |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 General Order 20-01 re: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 3/16/2020. (ddm) |
Filing 5 STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION. Signed by Judge J. P. Boulee on 2/6/20. (bnw) |
Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to IA Daron Village, LLC, Estevan Mancilla Leyva. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(ddm) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Arch Specialty Insurance Company to IA Daron Village, LLC (Friedman, Seth) |
Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Arch Specialty Insurance Company to Esteban Mancilla Leyva (Friedman, Seth) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Arch Specialty Insurance Company. (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-9325564) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(kt) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.