Joseph v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia et al
| Machelle Joseph |
| George P. Peterson, Marvin Lewis, Georgia Tech Athletic Association, Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, Shoshanna Engel and M. Todd Stansbury |
| 1:2020cv00502 |
| February 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Timothy C Batten |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1683 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, Georgia Tech Athletic Association, George P. Peterson, M. Todd Stansbury, Marvin Lewis and Shoshanna Engel. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AGANDC-9330153) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit S, #20 Exhibit T, #21 Exhibit U, #22 Exhibit V, #23 Civil Cover Sheet)(ah) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
