Coultas v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
| Ranah L. Coultas |
| Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company |
| 1:2020cv01094 |
| March 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Charles A Pannell |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
SECOND AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 04/30/2020. (dgs) (ADI)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER - This matter is before the Court on the Parties' Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings. Having considered all matters of record, and for good cause shown, the motion is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this matter is STAYED up through July 23, 2020. The parties are DIRECTED to file either the appropriate dismissal documents or a status report to inform the court of the results of the mediation by no later than July 24, 2020. The clerk is DIRECTED to submit this matter to the undersigned if the parties fail to comply. Signed by Judge Charles A. Pannell, Jr. on 4/21/2020. (tcc)
|
| Filing 8 Joint MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Pohlmann, Aaron) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. Discovery ends on 9/14/2020.(Pohlmann, Aaron) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
|
Filing 6
Amended General Order 20-01 re COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 3/30/20. (dgs) (ADI)
|
|
Filing 5
GENERAL ORDER 20-01 IN RE: Court Operations Under The Exigent Circumstances Created By COVID-19 and Related Coronavirus. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 3/16/2020. (tcc)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company Answer due 4/16/2020. Signed by Judge Charles A. Pannell, Jr. on 3/13/2020. (tcc)
|
| Filing 3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal,, by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order (Consent Order))(Pohlmann, Aaron) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parents The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., Hartford Holdings, Inc., and Hartford Life, Inc. for Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (jap) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AGANDC-9462678). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons, #3 Exhibit C - General Civil Case Filing Information Form, #4 Exhibit D - Filing of Waiver of Service of Summons Form, #5 Exhibit E - NOR Cherokee Superior, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (jap) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
