Georgia Oak Partners, LLC v. Stonehenge Partners, Inc.
Georgia Oak Partners, LLC |
Stonehenge Partners, Inc. |
1:2020cv01163 |
March 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Mark H Cohen |
Other Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 SECOND AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 04/30/2020. (dgs) (ADI) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint,, Stonehenge Partners, Inc. Answer due 5/15/2020. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 4/24/2020. (dob) |
Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Stonehenge Partners, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bedard, Edward) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint,, Stonehenge Partners, Inc. Answer due 5/1/2020. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 4/7/2020. (dob) |
Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Stonehenge Partners, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bedard, Edward) |
Clerks Notation re #5 Certificate of Interested Persons reviewed by MHC. (lwb) |
Filing 6 Amended General Order 20-01 re COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 3/30/20. (dgs) (ADI) |
Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons by Georgia Oak Partners, LLC. (Fisher, Jeffrey) |
Filing 4 General Order 20-01 re: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 3/16/2020. (dob) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER regarding Civil Litigation. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 3/23/2020. (dob) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Stonehenge Partners, Inc.. (eop) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Georgia Oak Partners, LLC. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number AGANDC-9477647) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Georgia Oak Partners, LLC v. Stonehenge Partners, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Georgia Oak Partners, LLC | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey H. Fisher |
Represented By: | Brittany Nash |
Represented By: | John P. Jett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Stonehenge Partners, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Edward Bedard |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.