Kinahan v. Standard Insurance Company
| Janice Hogue Kinahan |
| Standard Insurance Company |
| 1:2020cv01488 |
| April 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Orinda D Evans |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
THIRD AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 05/26/2020. (adg) (ADI)
|
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER approving the parties' #6 Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan. Signed by Judge Orinda D. Evans on 5/26/2020. (ddm)
|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Defendant Standard Insurance Company's First Request for Production of Documents to Plaintiff Janice Hogue Kinahan by Standard Insurance Company.(White, Brendan) |
| Filing 7 Initial Disclosures by Standard Insurance Company.(Bondurant, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 6 JOINT PRELIMINARY REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN filed by Standard Insurance Company. (Bondurant, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 5
SECOND AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 04/30/2020. (dgs) (ADI)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 14/2020.(White, Brendan) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. Modified on 4/16/2020 in order to add document link (anc). |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Standard Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Stancorp Financial Group, Inc. for Standard Insurance Company. (Bondurant, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 2
AMENDED GENERAL ORDER RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 3/30/20. (eop)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Standard Insurance Company. (Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number AGANDC-9573088) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -A, #2 Exhibit -B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
| Submission of #1 Notice of Removal for Review, to District Judge Orinda D. Evans. (eop) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kinahan v. Standard Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Standard Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Brendan Hanner White |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Johnson Bondurant |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Janice Hogue Kinahan | |
| Represented By: | Jeff Banks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
