Levins v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. et al
| Lashia Levins |
| Connect Staffing, Inc. and Delta Air Lines, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv01561 |
| April 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Alan J Baverman |
| Thomas W Thrash |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Electronic Summons Issued as to Connect Staffing, Inc. (kt) |
| Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as to Delta Air Lines, Inc. (kt) |
| Filing 4 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Lashia Levins (Wilensky, Michael) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Lashia Levins (Wilensky, Michael) |
Filing 2
AMENDED GENERAL ORDER RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 3/30/20. (eop)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Lashia Levins. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number AGANDC-9583539) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/14/2020: #2 Proposed Incorrect Summon(s)) (eop). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
