U.S. Bank National Association et al v. Miller
| Matthew David Miller |
| Webster Bank, N.A., New Penn Financial, LLC, U.S. Bank National Association and Ditech Financial, LLC |
| Attorney at Law Martha A. Miller |
| 1:2020cv01921 |
| May 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL ORDER RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 4/30/20. (eop)
|
| Filing 1 Bankruptcy Notice of Appeal, USBC Case#: 15-70981-WLH, ADV case#: 18-05198. Notice of Appeal filed 5/1/20 from Order entered 4/21/20 by Appellants, U. S. Bank Association, as Trustee for Bluewater Investment Trust 2018-A; and New Penn Financial, LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing. Fee Paid: Yes. USBC Receipt No. 53739175 filed by U.S. Bank National Association and New Penn Financial, LLC. (Attachments: #1 NOA, #2 Appealed Order, #3 Docket Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
