Isom v. The Kroger Co.
Saprina Isom |
The Kroger Co. and K |
1:2020cv02111 |
May 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Steven D Grimberg |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Compliance (Wasick, Jeffrey) |
Filing 5 STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION. Signed by Judge Steven D. Grimberg on May 20, 2020. (ash) (ash). |
Filing 4 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL ORDER RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 4/30/20. (eop) |
Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons by The Kroger Co.. (eop) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by The Kroger Co.. Discovery ends on 10/13/2020. (Attachments: #1 Jury Demand)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by The Kroger Co.. (Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number AGANDC-9702954) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -A -State Court Pleadings, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.