Estrada v. Office Depot, Inc.
| Michael Estrada |
| Office Depot, Inc. a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as Office Depot |
| 1:2020cv03036 |
| July 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Michael L Brown |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 9/1/2020. (ddm) (ADI)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER re #9 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint, it is ORDERED that Defendant Office Depot, Inc. d/b/a Office Depot will have through, and including, September 9, 2020 to answer or otherwise respond Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 8/20/2020. (jta)
|
| Set Deadlines/Hearings: Office Depot, Inc. answer due 9/9/2020 per #10 Order. (jta) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION (Joint Stipulation For Extension Of Time To Respond To Complaint) by Office Depot, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Appleby, Gavin) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Gavin Stone Appleby on behalf of Office Depot, Inc. (Appleby, Gavin) |
| Filing 7 Return of Service Executed by Michael Estrada. Office Depot, Inc. served on 7/28/2020, answer due 8/18/2020. (Pope, Matthew) |
|
Filing 6
SIXTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 08/03/2020. (dgs) (ADI)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER regarding civil litigation. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 7/24/2020. (bgt)
|
|
Filing 4
FIFTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 7/10/20. (tcc)
|
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons by Michael Estrada. (tcc) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Office Depot, Inc.. (tcc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Michael Estrada. (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-9939530) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tcc) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Estrada v. Office Depot, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Estrada | |
| Represented By: | Matthew N. Pope |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Office Depot, Inc. a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as Office Depot | |
| Represented By: | Gavin Stone Appleby |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
