Kelly v. Steadfast Services Inc. et al
| Charles Kelly |
| Robert Day, Michael Trey Davis, Steadfast Services Inc. and Katie Davis |
| 1:2020cv03378 |
| August 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| William M Ray |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 MOTION to Consolidate Cases with Brief In Support by Charles Kelly. (Feldman, Mitchell) |
| Filing 19 Certificate of Interested Persons by Charles Kelly. (Feldman, Mitchell) |
| Filing 18 ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand by Robert Day.(Messer, David) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. Modified to edit text on 10/2/2020 (ah). |
Filing 17
EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 09/28/2020. (ddm) (ADI)
|
| Filing 16 Steadfast Service, Inc.'s ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand by Steadfast Services Inc..(Messer, David) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| Filing 15 Michael Trey Davis' ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand by Michael Trey Davis.(Messer, David) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| Filing 14 Katie Davis' ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand by Katie Davis. Discovery ends on 2/18/2021.(Messer, David) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| Filing 13 Return of Service Executed by Charles Kelly. Steadfast Services Inc. served on 9/9/2020, answer due 9/30/2020. (Feldman, Mitchell) |
| Filing 12 Return of Service Executed by Charles Kelly. Michael Trey Davis served on 9/1/2020, answer due 9/22/2020. (Feldman, Mitchell) |
| Filing 11 Return of Service Executed by Charles Kelly. Katie Davis served on 9/1/2020, answer due 9/22/2020. (Feldman, Mitchell) |
|
Filing 10
SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 9/1/2020. (ddm) (ADI)
|
| Filing 9 Electronic Summons Issued as to Steadfast Services Inc. (ah) |
| Filing 8 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Charles Kelly Revised Summons for Steadfast Services, Inc. (Feldman, Mitchell) |
|
Filing 7
Standing Order Regarding Civil Litigation. Signed by Judge William M. Ray, II on 8/24/2020. (ah)
|
|
Filing 6
SIXTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 8/3/20. (eop)
|
| Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as to Robert Day. (eop) |
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Katie Davis. (eop) |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Michael Trey Davis. (eop) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Steadfast Services Inc.. (eop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Charles Kelly. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number AGANDC-10029563) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
