Lachance v. Northstar Location Services, LLC et al
Richard J. Lachance |
Northstar Location Services, LLC and Barclays Bank Delaware |
1:2020cv03848 |
September 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Justin S Anand |
J P Boulee |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER granting the parties' #14 Joint Motion to Stay Deadlines Pending Settlement and directing the Clerk to administratively close this case. The parties are to file the appropriate documents to dispose of this case no later than sixty days from the date of this Order. Absent an extension or further order of the Court, if no request to reopen the case within sixty days, the Court may dismiss the case with prejudice. Signed by Judge J. P. Boulee on 11/6/2020. (ddm) |
Civil Case Terminated. Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand terminated from case. (ddm) |
Filing 14 Joint MOTION to Stay all Deadlines Pending Settlement filed by Barclays Bank Delaware, Northstar Location Services, LLC. (ddm) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement and Joint Motion to Stay All Deadlines Pending Settlement by Northstar Location Services, LLC (Hill, Vernon) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Northstar Location Services, LLC Answer due 11/5/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 10/22/20. (rlb) |
Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, or Otherwise Respond by Barclays Bank Delaware. (Hill, Vernon) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting the parties' #9 Consent Motion for Extension of Time, until October 29, 2020, for Defendant Northstar Location Services, LLC to respond to #1 Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 10/20/2020. (ddm) |
Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, or Otherwise Respond by Northstar Location Services, LLC. (Hill, Vernon) |
Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Persons by Richard J. Lachance. (Honsalek, Brandon) |
Filing 7 Return of Service Executed by Richard J. Lachance. Barclays Bank Delaware served on 10/6/2020, answer due 10/27/2020. (Honsalek, Brandon) |
Filing 6 Return of Service Executed by Richard J. Lachance. Northstar Location Services, LLC served on 10/1/2020, answer due 10/22/2020. (Honsalek, Brandon) |
Filing 5 EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 09/28/2020. (ddm) (ADI) |
Filing 4 SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 9/1/20. (eop) |
Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Barclays Bank Delaware. (eop) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Northstar Location Services, LLC. (eop) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Richard J. Lachance. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number AGANDC-10153602) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -A -Dunning Letter, #2 Exhibit -B -Debt Validation Letter, #3 Exhibit -C -USPS Proof of Delivery, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.