SwissWatchExpo, Inc. v. Buyer's Best Bet, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: SwissWatchExpo, Inc.
Defendant: Buyer's Best Bet, Inc. a Georgia corporation doing business as eBestMedia and Lenny Estrin
Case Number: 1:2020cv03930
Filed: September 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Steve C Jones
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2020 Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by SwissWatchExpo, Inc.. Buyer's Best Bet, Inc. waiver mailed on 11/2/2020, answer due 1/4/2021; Lenny Estrin waiver mailed on 11/2/2020, answer due 1/4/2021. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Sperry, Marcy)
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 09/28/2020. (ddm) (ADI)
September 28, 2020 Filing 7 PROPOSED AO 121 . (Sperry, Marcy)
September 28, 2020 Notice of deficiency re AO Form 121. Plaintiff must complete and file AO Form 121. See LR 3.4. Docket the form using the event AO 121, located in the Other Filings/Other Documents menu. (rjs)
September 24, 2020 Filing 6 Electronic Summons Issued as to Lenny Estrin. (rjs)
September 24, 2020 Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as to Buyer's Best Bet, Inc. (rjs)
September 23, 2020 Filing 4 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by SwissWatchExpo, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Sperry, Marcy)
September 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 9/1/20. (eop)
September 22, 2020 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons by SwissWatchExpo, Inc.. (eop)
September 22, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by SwissWatchExpo, Inc.. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number AGANDC-10172832) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SwissWatchExpo, Inc. v. Buyer's Best Bet, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Buyer's Best Bet, Inc. a Georgia corporation doing business as eBestMedia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lenny Estrin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SwissWatchExpo, Inc.
Represented By: Kirk W. Watkins
Represented By: Melissa Fatima Castro
Represented By: Marcy Lane Sperry
Represented By: Alexandria Jane Aron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?