Mosely v. The Fresh Market, Inc.
| Renea Mosely |
| The Fresh Market, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv03957 |
| September 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Mark H Cohen |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; The Fresh Market, Inc.'s Answer due 12/20/2020. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 11/18/20. (jpa)
|
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by The Fresh Market, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Pomeroy, Scott) |
| Clerks Notation re #8 Corporate Disclosure Statement reviewed by MHC. (lwb) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, The Fresh Market, Inc. Answer due 11/20/2020. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 10/16/2020. (tcc)
|
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Fresh Market, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Pomegranate Holdings Inc for The Fresh Market, Inc. by The Fresh Market, Inc..(Pomeroy, Scott) |
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by The Fresh Market, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Pomeroy, Scott) |
| Filing 6 Return of Service Executed by Renea Mosely. The Fresh Market, Inc. served on 9/30/2020, answer due 10/21/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Service Form)(Karrh, Heather) |
|
Filing 5
EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 09/28/2020. (dgs) (ADI)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER regarding Civil Litigation. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 9/25/20. (jpa)
|
|
Filing 3
Seventh Amended General ORDER 20-01 in re: Court Operations under the Exigent Circumstances created by COVID-19 and Related Coronavirus. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 9/1/20. (jpa)
|
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to The Fresh Market, Inc. (jpa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Renea Mosely. (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-10182018) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jpa) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mosely v. The Fresh Market, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Renea Mosely | |
| Represented By: | Heather K. Karrh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Fresh Market, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Scott Pomeroy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
