Truist Bank v. Pontus Vault Portfolio II, LLC
| Truist Bank |
| Pontus Vault Portfolio II, LLC |
| 1:2020cv04271 |
| October 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Eleanor L Ross |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. IT IS ORDERED that the time within which Defendant Pontus Vault Portfolio, LLC may respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended through and including December 23, 2020. Signed by Judge Eleanor L. Ross on 12/9/2020. (jpk)
|
| Filing 9 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Pontus Vault Portfolio II, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Arden, Samuel) |
|
Filing 8
NINTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 12/08/2020. (adg) (ADI)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Pontus Vault Portfolio II, LLC may respond to the #1 Complaint by 12/9/2020. Signed by Judge Eleanor L. Ross on 11/23/2020. (jed)
|
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Truist Bank. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Joint Motion for Extension of Time)(Arpey, Vincent) |
| Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Truist Bank. Pontus Vault Portfolio II, LLC served on 10/28/2020, answer due 11/18/2020. (Elliott, John) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE FROM THE COURT: INSTRUCTIONS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE ELEANOR L. ROSS. (mlb) |
|
Filing 3
Eighth Amendment to General Order 20-01 re: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 9/28/2020. (jpk)
|
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Pontus Vault Portfolio II, LLC. (jpk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Truist Bank. (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-10272869) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Lease, #2 Exhibit B - Request for Consent to Sublease, #3 Exhibit C - Forsyth County News Article, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (jpk) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Truist Bank v. Pontus Vault Portfolio II, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Truist Bank | |
| Represented By: | Vincent Justin Arpey |
| Represented By: | John Hartshorn Elliott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pontus Vault Portfolio II, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Samuel Robinson Arden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
