Price v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
Brittany R. Price |
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson |
1:2020cv04392 |
October 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Richard W Story |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER denying 623 Motion to Strike Errata and 630 Defendant Ethicon's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Dr. Klosterhalfen; Granting in part and denying in part 627 Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude Testimony of Dr. Villarraga. Plaintiffs' Motion is granted with respect to the exclusion of FDA evidence consistent with the Court's November 25, 2020 Order [Doc. 690/691] and denied as to the remaining challenges. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 12/04/2020. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02782-RWS et al. (Spread to 2019 and 2020 cases)(rvb) |
Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiffs' 624 Motion to Exclude Timothy Ulatwoski and 625 Motion to Exclude Reynaldo Librojo. Ethicon is hereby PRECLUDED from calling them as expert witnesses. Plaintiff's 626 Motion to Exclude Ethicon's Surgeon Experts (Dr. William Cobb, Dr. Jarrod Kaufman, Dr. Karl LeBlanc, Dr. Bruce Ramshaw, Dr. Guy Voeller) is DENIED. Defendant Ethicon's 631 Motion to Exclude Dr. Sean Orenstein and 632 Motion to Exclude Dr. Eric Pauli are DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 11/25/2020. (originally docketed at 693 in 1:17-md-2782-RWS)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02782-RWS et al. (Spread to 2019 and 2020 cases)(rvb) |
Filing 5 ORDER (re 651 in 1:17-md-02782-RWS): Defendants' (651) Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED concerning Crumbly, the first trial, and DENIED without prejudice for purposes of the Unscheduled Trial Cases and future MDL proceedings. (Spread to 2019 and 2020 cases) Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 11/25/2020. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02782-RWS et al(rvb) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting in 1:17-md-02782-RWS 605 Motion in Limine To Exclude Evidence Relating to the United States Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") or Its Processes in case 1:17-md-02782-RWS. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 11/25/2020. (Spread to 2019 and 2020 cases) Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 11/25/2020. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02782-RWS et al.(bdb) |
Filing 3 ORDER re (627 in 1:17-md-02782-RWS) Plaintiffs' MOTION to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Marta L. Villarraga, Ph.D. filed by Marvin Franklin, Connie Franklin. The Court wishes to have the benefit of Defendants' position before ruling. Because Defendants have not directly addressed Plaintiffs' objections to these opinions, Defendants are directed to file a sur-reply addressing these objections within fourteen (14) days of the entry of the Order. (see order for details) Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 11/12/2020. (Spread to 2019 and 2020 cases) Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02782-RWS et al.(bdb) |
Filing 2 EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 9/28/2020. (bdb) |
Filing 1 SHORT FORM COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Brittany R. Price. (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-10309773) DIRECT FILE MDL - Northern Florida. (bdb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.