City of South Fulton Board of Code Enforcement v. Richardson
Plaintiff: City of South Fulton Board of Code Enforcement
Defendant: Rodney Johnson Richardson
Case Number: 1:2020cv04678
Filed: November 17, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Leigh Martin May
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2020 Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing action. (tmf)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist--
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Because the Court lacks jurisdiction over this matter, and because the case cannot be remanded to the appropriate state court, the case must instead be dismissed. Therefore, the Clerk is DIRECTED to DISMISS and CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 11/20/2020. (tmf)
November 20, 2020 Civil Case Terminated. (tmf)
November 20, 2020 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Rodney Johnson Richardson re #5 Order, #6 Clerk's Judgment. (tmf)
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. It is further ORDERED that service of process shall not issue at the present time, and the Clerk shall submit this file to the assigned District Judge for a frivolity determination under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on 11/19/2020. (tmf)
November 19, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Rodney Johnson Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(tmf) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.
November 19, 2020 Submission of #3 Notice of Removal, for frivolity review, to District Judge Leigh Martin May. (tmf)
November 19, 2020 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Rodney Johnson Richardson re #4 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis,. (tmf)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 9/28/20. (eop)
November 18, 2020 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Rodney Johnson Richardson re #2 Order. (eop)
November 18, 2020 Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (eop)
November 17, 2020 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Rodney Johnson Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Notice of Filing, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: City of South Fulton Board of Code Enforcement v. Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rodney Johnson Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: City of South Fulton Board of Code Enforcement
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?