Webb v. Pizza Hut et al
Terrance Landell Webb |
Equal Employment Opportunity Office and Pizza Hut |
1:2020cv04752 |
November 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Amy Totenberg |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing action. (rlb)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
|
|
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Terrance Landell Webb re #7 Clerk's Judgment, #6 Order. (rlb) |
Civil Case Terminated. (rlb) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT filed by Terrance Landell Webb. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rlb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
|
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Terrance Landell Webb re #3 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis,. (rlb) |
Submission of #4 Complaint, to District Judge Amy Totenberg for frivolity review. (rlb) |
|
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Terrance Landell Webb re #2 Order. (eop) |
Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (eop) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Terrance Landell Webb. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.