Walker v. Neutron Holdings, Inc. et al
| Jeffrey R. Walker |
| Lime and Neutron Holdings, Neutron Holdings, Inc. and John Does 1-3 |
| 1:2020cv04805 |
| November 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 pl |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing action. (tmf)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 13
ORDER: Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration #2 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Complaint #1 is DISMISSED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 1/22/2021. (tmf)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (tmf) |
|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: re: #11 Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan. Discovery is STAYED pending a ruling on Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration. If the motion is granted, the action will be dismissed or stayed pending arbitration. If it is denied, the parties will have a 4-month-discovery period. Time periods for all motions will begin running the day of the Court's ruling. Initial disclosures will be due 14 days from the Court's ruling. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 1/4/2021. (bdb)
|
| Filing 11 JOINT PRELIMINARY REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN filed by Neutron Holdings, Inc.. (Cochenour, Duane) |
| Submission of #2 MOTION to Compel Arbitration, to District Judge Leigh Martin May. (tmf) |
| Filing 10 REPLY in Support re #2 MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Neutron Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Cochenour, Duane) Modified on 12/28/2020 to edit event (tmf). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Roger W. Orlando on behalf of Jeffrey R. Walker (Orlando, Roger) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE re #2 MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Jeffrey R. Walker. (Orlando, Roger) |
|
Filing 7
NINTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 12/08/2020. (adg) (ADI)
|
| Clerks Notation re #6 Corporate Disclosure Statement. Read and approved by LMM. (bnp) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Neutron Holdings, Inc. by Neutron Holdings, Inc..(Cochenour, Duane) |
| Filing 5 Neutron Holdings, Inc. ANSWER to COMPLAINT with Jury Demand by Neutron Holdings, Inc.. Discovery ends on 4/30/2021.(Cochenour, Duane) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 11/25/2020. (tcc)
|
|
Filing 3
EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 9/28/2020. (tcc)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Compel Arbitration by Neutron Holdings, Inc.. (tcc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Neutron Holdings, Inc.. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AGANDC-10416913) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tcc) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
