Evans et al v. Bearback, LLC et al
Jeffrey L. Evans and Duvall & Evans, Inc. |
Bearback, LLC and James M. Duvall |
1:2020cv04857 |
December 1, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Amy Totenberg |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. § 1338 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 MOTION for Extension of Time File Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by Duvall & Evans, Inc., Jeffrey L. Evans. (Fuller, Zachary) |
|
|
Filing 16 Certificate of Interested Persons by Bearback, LLC, James M. Duvall. (Leeper, Jeffrey) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Claims Against Defendants Bearback, LLC and James M. Duvall Pursuant to FRCP 12(B) with Brief In Support by Bearback, LLC, James M. Duvall. (Attachments: #1 Brief Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss)(Leeper, Jeffrey) |
|
APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #13 APPLICATION for Admission of Martin Bruce Sipple Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-10600385).. Attorney Martin B. Sipple added appearing on behalf of Duvall & Evans, Inc., Jeffrey L. Evans (nmb) |
APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #14 APPLICATION for Admission of Steven Michael Hogan Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-10600433).. Attorney Steven M. Hogan added appearing on behalf of Duvall & Evans, Inc., Jeffrey L. Evans (nmb) |
Filing 14 APPLICATION for Admission of Steven Michael Hogan Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-10600433).by Duvall & Evans, Inc., Jeffrey L. Evans. (Weathington, Paul) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse. |
Filing 13 APPLICATION for Admission of Martin Bruce Sipple Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-10600385).by Duvall & Evans, Inc., Jeffrey L. Evans. (Weathington, Paul) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse. |
Filing 12 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Bearback, LLC, James M. Duvall. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Consent Order on Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint)(Leeper, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 11 Letter from Clerk re: LR 83.1 Pro Hac Vice requirements sent to Martin B. Sipple. Clerk to follow-up by 1/14/2021. (nmb) |
Filing 10 Letter from Clerk re: LR 83.1 Pro Hac Vice requirements sent to Steven M. Hogan. Clerk to follow-up by 1/14/2021. (nmb) |
Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed filed by James M. Duvall, Bearback, LLC. All Defendants. (Leeper, Jeffrey) |
|
|
Filing 6 AO Form 120 forwarded to Commissioner. (rlb) |
Filing 5 PROPOSED AO 120 . (Fuller, Zachary) |
|
Notice of deficiency re AO Form 120. Plaintiff must complete and file AO Form 120. See LR 3.4 and LPR 1.4. Docket the form using the event AO 120, located in the Other Filings/Other Documents menu. (eop) |
Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to James M. Duvall. (eop) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Bearback, LLC. (eop) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Jeffrey L. Evans and Duvall & Evans, Inc.. (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number BGANDC-10433362) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.