Scofield v. United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
| Edgar Clayton Scofield, III |
| United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM) |
| 1:2020cv05051 |
| December 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steven D Grimberg |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 8912 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Edgar Clayton Scofield, III re #7 Notice (Other). (jed) |
Filing 7
TENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 01/27/2021. (adg) (ADI)
|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Compliance by Edgar Clayton Scofield, III (tmf) |
| Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Edgar Clayton Scofield, III. United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM) served on 12/16/2020, answer due 1/6/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service as to Director, #2 Proof of Service as to Mark Robbins)(jed) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION. Signed by Judge Steven D. Grimberg on 12/15/2020. (jed)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Edgar Clayton Scofield, III re #4 Order. (jed) |
|
Filing 3
NINTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 12/08/2020. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 12/08/2020. (rvb)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM), U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (rvb) (rvb). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Edgar Clayton Scofield, III. (Filing fee $402, receipt number GAN100126152)(rvb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/14/2020: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Civil Cover Sheet) (rvb). |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Edgar Clayton Scofield, III re #3 Order. (rvb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Scofield v. United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM) | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Edgar Clayton Scofield, III | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
