Jones v. Muscogee County Prison
| Osric Antonio Jones |
| Muscogee County Prison |
| 1:2020cv05065 |
| December 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steve C Jones |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
TENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 01/27/2021. (adg) (ADI)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Osric Antonio Jones re #7 Notice (Other). (rjs) |
| Submission of #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to District Judge Steve C. Jones. (rjs) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE Of Filing Letter to Court by Osric Antonio Jones. (rjs) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE Of Filing Letter by Osric Antonio Jones. (jed) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Service of #3 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 12/18/2020. (rjs)
|
| Filing 3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint: The undersigned RECOMMENDS that this case be TRANSFERRED to the Columbus Division of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia for further proceedings. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the referral to the undersigned Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 12/18/2020. (rjs) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Osric Antonio Jones re #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and #4 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (rjs) |
|
Filing 2
NINTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 12/8/20. (eop)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Osric Antonio Jones re #2 Order. (eop) |
| Submission of #1 Complaint for IFP and Frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. (eop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Osric Antonio Jones. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. Muscogee County Prison | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Muscogee County Prison | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Osric Antonio Jones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
