Leytman v. Saul
Plaintiff: Luisa Leytman
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration and Andrew Saul
Case Number: 1:2020cv05084
Filed: December 15, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Eleanor L Ross
Referring Judge: Linda T Walker
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 01/27/2021. (adg) (ADI)
December 28, 2020 Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul via U.S. Attorney, Office of Regional Chief Counsel and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summons Office of Regional Chief Counsel, #2 Summons Attorney General of the United States)(adg)
December 28, 2020 Filing 4 COMPLAINT filed by Luisa Leytman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(adg) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.
December 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. This action shall proceed as any other civil action. Counsel for Plaintiff shall be charged with serving Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 12/28/2020. (adg)
December 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NINTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 12/8/2020. (tcc)
December 16, 2020 Notification of Docket Correction case is referred to Magistrate Judge Walker not Magistrate Judge Salinas (aar)
December 16, 2020 Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. (aar)
December 16, 2020 Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (tcc)
December 15, 2020 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Luisa Leytman. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons Three (3))(tcc)
December 15, 2020 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. (aar)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Leytman v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Luisa Leytman
Represented By: Ida Comerford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?