Sartor v. Pearce et al
Gary Sartor |
U.S. Marshals Service (USMS), The GEO Group, Officer L. Johnson, Officer Cotton, Warden Pearce and Officer Moore |
1:2020cv05182 |
December 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
John K Larkins |
Amy Totenberg |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Gary Sartor re #6 Order. Forms sent to party: 28:1331 Form. (rlb) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing to Warden re #6 Order. (rlb) |
|
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Gary Sartor re #5 Notice (Other). (rlb) |
|
Submission of #2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account for IFP and Frivolity determination; and #3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (eop) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Gary Sartor re #4 Order. (eop) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Gary Sartor. (eop) |
Filing 2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Gary Sartor. (eop) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Gary Sartor. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.